A cartoon of Håkan Forss generated a few reactions about which might better represent organizational reality. It is a good question so I thought to post up this “Discussion Blog” that is a bit different from my normal style of doing things. Your thoughts and comments would be most appreciated.
Take these two different illustrations on roughly the same thing:
In Håkan Forss’ illustration on the left, we have what I see as people simply rejecting the idea of a different wheel for the wagon. (click here to see an enlarged version of that illustration)
In Square Wheels One, we have people possibly unaware that different wheels exist.
• In your experience, is the first situation more common than the second? Are people more commonly rejecting outside ideas or unaware of them?
• Are outsiders to the team more commonly offering suggestions with the wheels from other team members who are not actively involved?
• Are Round Wheels generally found within the wagon? Do the round wheels in an organization already exist or do they more commonly need invention?
• Where does “disruptive innovation” appear in all this work?
• Where are the Lean approaches operating in either or both of these situations?
• Is leadership actively against change or are they simply unaware of a need for it?
I certainly have my views on things, which I will elaborate on Part Two of the blog, “The Square Wheels, LEGO Controversy: Thoughts on Leadership and Engagement.”
What do you think about the reality of how things
generally work in most organizations?
Please add some thoughts and comments below,
For the FUN of It!
Dr. Scott Simmerman is a designer of team building games and organization improvement tools. Managing Partner of Performance Management Company since 1984, he is an experienced presenter and consultant.
LEGO® is a registered trademark of LEGO A/S, a corporation incorporated under the laws of Denmark.